ANALYSES
/BALKAN
Source: The Bosnia Times
Source: The Bosnia Times
When
we look back to 19th century Balkans reality, almost through whole
century we can see that it was divided between the three centers of power. In
the 19th century these centuries were İstanbul-Moscow-Vienna, last
one later in combination with Berlin. It seems that this ‘’triangle’’ is going
to be repeated in the coming years in slightly different form.
By: Jahja
Muhasilović, thebosniatimes.com
Among the historians
there is a one unproved and unnoficial theory that history is
always repeating itself. It is hard to prove this theory, but what is for sure
is that we are entering the 19th century like reality in different forms,
but with the same players in the Balkans. Other famous and theory much easier
to prove among themodern times historians is
that processes which are happening in the 20th and 21st centuries are
actually continuation and final resolvement period for the processes which
started in the 19th century. Balkans we are entering in the next decades seems
like proving these two theories, especially when it comes to foreign interests
and fight for the domination in the region.
When we look back to
19th century Balkans reality, almost through whole century we can see that it
was divided between the three centers of power. In the 19th century these
centres were İstanbul-Moscow-Vienna, last one later in combination with Berlin.
It seems that this ‘’triangle’’ is going to be repaeted in the coming years in
slightly different form.
Actually this
‘’repeated’’ 19th century Balkans starts becoming reality after 2008 economic
crisis broke out. It affected EU’s primal ideological base and the most
important driving force economy, very hard. So, Union’s dominant economic power Germany
had to focus on saving some member countries, and the Union as a whole had to
redirect its strenght to interior problems. EU now have full hands and big
problems inside the club which they have to deal with, so this created kind of
vacuum in the Balkans, which opened the space for other two rising players and
enabled them to much more easily enter the region with their booming economies
at home, as the Ottoman empire’s crisis paved the way for the rising European
powers in the first place Austria and Russia, to spread their influence to region
in the in 19th century. Today these new or to be more specific old players are
Russia and Turkey. It seems that it is natural for them to be active
participant in the shaping of the Balkans then being passive, next to Western
and Central European powers which are already present in the region.
Instead of 19th
century Vienna and Berlin we have today Brussels centered European Union, which same as it was in the 19th century seems like
the most important and influental axis of power in the region, playing the
European integration card to include the region in its club, as it was playing
the ‘’building constitutional nation state’’ and bringing ‘’civilization and
equality’’ card in the 19th century for the same goal. Different from other
EU’s foreign influence areas, the Balkans are especially dominated by the
German speaking countries. The real power behind the curtain of the EU’ s
Balkans integration policy actually is Germany and in some aspects Austria
also. This is true for Trade, Financial, Migration, Culture, Sports and almost
all other sectors. Behind the veil of EU, these countries are actually playing
the most dominant role, without minimazing the role of other powers in the
region like UK or France. But didn’t the ‘’other powers’’ also had some influence
and role in the region in the 19th century also? They maybe even had much
bigger influence and role then they have today. So this brings to conclusion
that from the ‘’western’’ sides this time we have much bigger domination in the
region, of those from the German speaking countries then there was in the past.
However with or
without German influence ‘’Westerners’’ are still trying to include region in
their system of value as they were trying in the 19th century, to save it from
‘’backwardness’’ of the Ottoman civilization, like they are saving the region
today from the backwardness of the nationalism, which also is 19th century
European product, and they see it like it is something that was invented in the
Balkans and not imported from the Europe and which for European perspective now
is outdated and is guilty for all bad things happening in the region, as it was
also trying to save the region century later from also other European product
called Communism. So maybe day will come Europe will try to save Balkans from
backwardness of the democracy and market economy. However last economic crisis
opened space for manouevre to other players and seems like is bringing to an
end the EU’s hegemony in shaping the regions future.
When it comes to
Russia, it never actually stoped being active in the region, it just changed
few ideological forms through past. After fall of Russian Empire it reshaped
it’s playing card in the Balkans, from acting as a protector of the Ortodox
population of the Balkans to supporting the Communist movements and Communist
states in the region. After fall of the Soviet Union this power axis continued
influencing the region as a Russian Federation through energy hegemony, but
again not leaving its old style, which would be favorizing the Orthodox
population. Region is almost totaly dependent on Russian gas, which renewed
Russia’s importance and brought it again soft power status. After energy sector
some moves are done in financial and banking sectors. Example is Russian
Sberbank entering the Balkans markets very easily and in very short time
positioned itself among already present German and Austrian banks in the first
place, even went that far to buy Austrian Volksbank. Start of diversifying the
influence to other sectors then energy is positioning Russia and minimizing the
power and role of the EU which has the most diversive influence and domination
in the region including almost all sectors important in order to be dominant
axis of power.
Third player in the
future, that could play important role in the Balkans is Turkey. This country
whose geographical borders are for a almost two thousand years one entity with
the Balkans is a a successor of the
Ottoman empire which for the many centuries had central role in
the Balkans and was almost totaly absent for a nearly century as a important
player in the region, looks like regaining its power and the role back again.
In the last few years we saw some moves by the Turkish goverment which proves
their intentions to influence the region. This country which has booming
economy, already passed Russia’s economic growth, is seen as a natural player
in the region, but still didn’t come out of the ‘’potential power’’ clothe, and
put on ‘’soft power’’ clothe, because of not having clear Balkans vision. One of
the Turkey’s faces among many other faces is that Turkey is also a Balkans
country, which makes job much easier fot the country, because it is already by
geography positioned in the region. Turkey is Balkans country with huge
population growth rate and even today has bigger population then all Balkans
countries combined. In the future this gap will be much bigger, so we could
expect in some 30 years that Turkey will have two times more population then
Balkans as a whole. Turkey also has large Balkans diaspora inside the country,
and relatively large Turkish diaspora in the Balkans, which from the aspect of
building the bridges between the two entities is very important factor. Turkey
is expected to play important role in the future in peninsula’s energy segment.
Huge Nabucco project sponsored also by Europe, which should pass through Turkey
and Balkans is goaled to minimize dependency on Russia in the energy sector.
Project was also of big importance for the EU, whose number one source when it
comes to gas is Russia. This brings Turkey and EU to close cooperation because
of Russian threat, in very similar scenario of the 19th century when European
states assisted Ottomans against the rising Russia. As a indirect consenquence
gas line was aimed to rise Turkey’s importance for the Balkans. Turkey started
acting independently from the energy allies in Europe, and started giving
importance to the so called Blue Stream route, which is delivering gas to
Turkey directly withouth passing through the third countries. This maneuver
forced EU to search for the alternative routes through Ukraine, a move that
from the European perspective is very dangerous, because of unstability of the
Ukrainian goverment, which always is under big threat of becoming Russian
outpost. Not just energy but other economical and financial factors are slowly
positioning Turkey in the region, and not to forget Turkish soaps which in
short time became unavoidable relaxation tool for the Balkans population and
successufully doing its important task in breaking long time distorted
Turkish image as a unwanted element in the Balkans policy.
True or not, theories
of repaeting of the history and continuation and closing of the 19th century
started processes in the next two centuries seems proved in the Balkans case.
Last Balkans triangle finished in the blood, and all axis sides failing in
their intentions, soon saw themselves also entering the first World War with
all sides suffering huge losses, even some saw their own centuries long empires
going to history’s graveyard. When it comes to region, Balkans triangle
vertices having their hands in the region, ended up in its famous process which
is wearing regions name and originating in the 19th century, so called
balkanization process. Maybe living this process is region’s unavoidable
destiny, remains to be seen in the future.
Comments
Post a Comment